Psyforce's Log

Psychics and Law Enforcement united

2009-08-29T00:56:00.000-07:00

According to some people, law enforcement agencies do not work with psychics AT ALL!
How can we even think it possible?

Well here is some more evidence of the effectiveness of the interaction between genuine psychics and great (retired) law enforcement personnel. This group was established by Detective Kelly and friends in Arizona USA and he and his group of volunteers have been called upon many times by... LAW ENFORCEMENT!
They have worked on hundreds of cases of which some very successful!

More information is available through the FINDME WEBSITE

Remote Viewing and locating missing persons

2009-08-29T00:17:00.000-07:00

Here is an excellent example of how Remote Viewing (a trained psychic skill) can be used by law enforcement. That is...if law enforcement accept the fact that Psychics CAN at times be useful.

But like Joe says:'It is like a knife fight in a phone booth!'

I guess in some places it will never change!

Police Detectives Trained as Remote Viewers

2009-07-20T11:27:00.000-07:00

In previous blog pages I mentioned a video footage of Remote Viewer and trainer David Morehouse actually helping the Police and giving training to a group of police detectives.

Now I could not exactly recall the name of the particular TV show. It is called 'Strange but True' and it is actually Season 4 - Episode 3.

Full Recap
Part One: David Morehouse was a Major in the US army in 1988, but whilst on a training mission in the Jordanian Desert, he was hit by a stray bullet. Whilst he was there an angel came to him, saying he should try for a more peaceful job. From there he went to the army psychiatrist, saying he was suffering from vivid halluciantions. Instead of being invalided out of the army, however, he was placed in a top secret army camp and given notes on a previous venture called 'Project Grill Flame', he was trained up to become a remote viewer. There he was used to see if a captured solider, Gary Higgins, was still alive by psychically linking himself to his cell.

Part Two: With the Gulf War in 1990, the remote viewers were used to try and psychically effect Saddam Hussein by a process known as 'Remote Influencing'. Because he did not agree with such uses, he revealed all about the processes to the media and left the Army.

He was subsequently asked by the Cartaret police, Cartaret being a small suburb in New Jersey, to look for a missing person by remote viewing. He was successful in this and it led to him training up the police force in remote viewing techniques.

David Morehouse has also written 'REMOTE VIEWING: The complete user's manual for controlled remote viewing'

This is the best and most comprehensive book I have read about Remote Viewing so far! It explains the process and the structure of RV and the findings of the reseach so far.

It also explains why it would be very unlikely that the US military (and other Military Units in general) have given up using (and further developing) this valuable tool.

Terrorism, National Security & Psychic Investigations

2009-07-15T05:23:00.000-07:00

I was reading an article by Victor Zammit [A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife] and he states:

What's to be done?

Law enforcement agencies ought to obtain the services of highly gifted psychics - not the run of the mill commercial ones, but those who can pass empirical tests for repeatable accuracy. There may be at least four or five in each country who ought to be regarded as absolute 'pure gold.' These would be hard to find as the truly gifted ones keep a very low, non-commercial, very private profile.

And this is exactly what is happening...all reputable Law Enforcement Agencies are looking into alternative ways of stopping terrorism.

Terrorism is likely to be with us for a long time. While there are human beings willing to blow themselves up in shopping centers, while terrorists plan mass killings and to blow sky high modern tourist hotels, pilot jumbo jets into sky-scapers, it becomes critically urgent to find ways to effectively combat terrorism - whether it be in the Middle East, in ASIA, in the U.S, UK, Europe or in Ireland. Innovative methods, especially in uncharted areas such as afterlife participation in terrorism have to be pursued. The consequences of restricted or incompetent crime detection are enormous. Access to gifted psychics and remote viewers to pursue terrorists is and will be critical.

Mmmm...not officially ofcourse but gifted psychics and trained remote viewers were in the past (and are still) evaluated, selected and used as an intellicence tool in counter terrorism stategies.

Read Victor Zammit's entire article here: http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/terrorism.html

Law Enforcement and Psychics

2009-07-11T18:30:00.000-07:00

It is about time the truth has been told! Only to set the record straight...

Police and other reputable Law Enforcement Agencies do use Psychics in their attempt to solve to most difficult cases. At times the psychics do provide very usefull information, which in turn allows the detectives to find evidence.

And we have to be very realistic here...detectives will usually only ask for assistance from other experts or psychics if:

1. their investigation runs dry
2. they believe the expert or psychic may have information can lead to a break through.

We now expect the Psychic to solve the case...but that is not realistic! The psychic may contribute as a witness (whoms' value in a court of law is even less than a hear-say witness)but the information given can provide new leads to investigate!

Why don't we hear about it in the news?
Simply because all Police Agencies have a 'formal policy' that they do not employ psychics, yet the do listen to any information that might be relevant to a case, provided by anyone...even anonimous. Why? Because any good detective or investigator knows that you cannot exclude any possible valuable information!

Get Real!
Psychics are human beings, in fact every person is a bit psychic...some more than others...but hey! If an entire team of trained detectives are unable to find any leads...what are the chances an ordinary person can? And still...at times...they do!

Now combine, detectives, trackers and psychics...and you have?
A great team! Which helps Law Enforcement.

Is that real?
Oh yes it is! A group of psychics and detectives together with tracker dog trainers volunteer to find missing persons and provide leads in homocide cases.

http://www.findme2.com/law_enforcement.html

No this is not in Western Australia...This group is based in the US!

So do not let anyone tell you that law enforcement do not use psychic information!
THEY DO!

The Inconvenient Truth

2009-07-06T02:36:00.000-07:00

Police won't rule out using psychics in murder inquiries

Article from: PerthNow

Nicole Cox, police reporter

July 04, 2009 06:00pm

WA Police chiefs have refused to issue a blanket ban on officers listening to psychics and using their information.

This is despite the police force's communications director describing mediums as ``hocus-pocus'' and stating ``no reputable policing agencies use psychics''.

Well...he may not realise it yet...but he has just insulted most of the worlds intelligence community, as the CIA, DIA, DOD, MI5, MI6, FBI and many others HAVE USED PSYCHICS in the past. The CIA has reseased 89.000 pages of information on the Star Gate program. The research and development of Remote Viewing (Controlled Psychic Functioning for Intelligence gathering) was a classified program for over 25 years! Only after some of the Remote Viewers went public the program was canceled and declassified under the pretext that it was not really useful as an intelligence tool. Mmmm...and they needed 25 years of research to establish that fact? Now isn't that interesting!

An exclusive report in the The Sunday Times last week revealed that detectives working on the Corryn Rayney murder investigation had approached psychic and author Debbie Malone for help in their hunt for the killer.

They contacted her in September 2008 when she was in Perth for a psychic roadshow.

Malone, one of Australia's most prominent psychics and spirit mediums, claimed to have made unexpected contact with Mrs Rayney a year after her murder. She has detailed the events in a book Never Alone: A Medium's Journey.

The Sunday Times' revelations were initially attacked by police communications chief Neil Stanbury.

In an email sent to The Sunday Times on Monday and circulated in the police force and media, he described the story as ``patently untrue'' and accused the newspaper of misleading its readers.

``Psychics have no credibility or scientific basis upon which to make their claims,'' Mr Stanbury said .

Again...there has not only been over 25 years of research and development documented and publicized by Russell Targ, Hall Puthoff, Ingo Swann, JoeMcMonEagle, Lyn Buchanan, Paul Smith, David Morehouse and many others!

``No reputable policing agencies use psychics or employ psychics, clairvoyants or other varieties of such people. Their claims of assisting police in solving major crimes are never substantiated.

Hahaha, I actually have a video of David Morehouse (US Military trained Remote Viewer) not only helping the Police in the US with a murder case using the controlled psychic technique called Remote Viewing, but also TEACH AN ENTIRE TEAM OF POLICE DETECTIVES HOW TO DO IT!

What psychics actually do is cause further misery to families and other victims of crime.''

That is ONLY once stated by a person who had a really bad experience and it is now blown out of proportions and every person who has no knowledge of psychic functioning starts to quote that expression of frustration!

But on Wednesday, police were forced to apologise when their own investigations revealed The Sunday Times report was completely accurate.

Well that is what they are there for...isn't it? To investigate...and get the facts straight! Not only that...It also shows that Debbie was telling the truth! It also shows that Police DO at times use psychics as a source of information, although their official policy is they do NOT.

Police admitted an officer involved in the Rayney investigation had approached Malone and they had been unaware of this until reading the newspaper.

Police also conceded they breached evidence handling protocols when Mrs Rayney's diary was handed to Malone for a spiritual channelling exercise.

Insp Paul Greenshaw, officer-in-charge of the Major Crime Squad, told The Sunday Times he was concerned Malone had been given hands-on access to Mrs Rayney's diary and conceded the two officers had not followed ``accepted practice'' in the handling of exhibits.

Insp Greenshaw said he had this week addressed his 44 officers to reiterate that contacting psychics, clairvoyants and other spiritual mediums was not an accepted practice for homicide investigations.

Well...I do not expect the WA Police to be as progressive as the international intelligence community, it would give some complications in a court of law, so for the sake of Public Relations and to avoid Legal Complications, let's just stick to the full denyablility of the use of psychics.

The detectives get all the credit and 'promoted' because psychics...DO NOT WORK FOR THE POLICE, nor do they provide any useful information. They simply do not exist and if they should...they are for entertainment purposes only!

That is what the public should believe! Psychics are nothing but an entertaining show!

He stopped short of saying the incident had embarrassed the WA Police force, instead describing the situation as ``unfortunate''.

Yes, well not as 'unfortunate' as the people who risk being ridiculed in public, while merely trying to assist! And not as 'unfortunate' as all those people that still need to be found on which the only new lead...may well come from a psychic or a Remote Viewer!

He said he had not been informed of the contact between his officers and Malone until he read the paper.

Isn't that what supervising police detectives should do? INVESTIGATE and be informed before uttering any accusations? But atleast he is as fair to admit to it and justice is done!

``(The contact) was recorded as per the practice, but I didn't know about it as the supervisor,'' Insp Greenshaw said.

``(Debbie Malone) wasn't permitted to open or read (the diary), but I believe she wanted to hold it ... It was in a plastic bag.

``It's not recognised as a good investigative practice to employ psychics,'' he said. ``But we won't turn anybody's information away. We accept information from anybody and we assess it against what the known facts are.''

The detective senior constable is no longer with the squad. He had been promoted, police said.

Promoted...after a slap on the wrist...Sure! Well atleast someone within the Police force has the nerves to explore other possibilities! I wonder has he been promoted to a place where the do not have to deal with the legal issues and everyone has to keep quiet?

Insp Greenshaw said he contacted the officer on Monday to give him ``guidance'' about the issue, but he was not formally disciplined.

``This is one individual that took it upon himself to do it and that's exactly what he did. He saw the program, saw the roadshow and decided to ring her,'' he said.

In her book, Malone said two detectives gave her Mrs Rayney's diary as an ``energy source'' and accompanied her to a track in Kings Park where the 44-year-old's body was recovered from a bush grave.

Insp Greenshaw said police would not apologise to Malone for their initial denials or request that the information be pulled from her book.

No, ofcourse they can not say; "I am terribly sorry Mrs. Malone, I was wrong and jumped to the conclusion based on our policy that the publication and your claim was false"...that would be so embarrasing!

It would be even more embarrasing if they found that the information provided by Debbie Malone was indeed correct and helpful...so let's please not even ask about that!I guess we will never find out the truth even if it were so...as it might be an INCONVENIENT TRUTH

For legal reasons, comments cannot be published on this matter.

It is a Democratic and free country isn't it? What ever happened to freedom of speech? Having a public dialog...and a constructive conversation?

Because I CAN envision...Australian police detectives working with trained psychics and detectives being trained in the development of their own psychic abilities...their gut feeling...their intuition...their nouse... It can not only assist in investigations...It CAN save lives at times!

I have the RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT...I DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK UP...

So I will go back into hiding and help other police forces around the world with...psychic information on the cases they are working on. Mostly anonimous ofcourse, because if you do provide extremely detailed information you could not have possibly known..you might get arrested and you do have a problem in some countries if you can not explain by any 'normal' (According to their culture's norm) means how you obtained that information!

As for the WA Police...well if they only had the time and the manpower to investigate the possible denyable use of psychics in police forces around the world, they would likely come to the conclusion that it could save them a lot of time and heaps of money in some cases and they would simply hire a private ....consultant.

Yet I can't help but smile...knowingly... ;-)

We won't listen to psychics: Rayney sister : thewest.com.au

2009-06-29T23:31:00.000-07:00

It never ceases to amaze me how ungrateful and unthoughtful people can respond to the help of the public. After reading this article in the Western Australian I get even more depressed.

Tuesday, 30 June 2009 | 02:08 PM
We won't listen to psychics: Rayney sister
30th June 2009, 7:15 WST

The sister of murdered woman Corryn Rayney has criticised a psychic who claims to have information on her death, saying she was trying to profit from the family’s grief.

>>>That is quite an accusation! You might aswell accuse the journalists writing about it in the news, they get paid for it, and the police they get paid by the tax-payers! Oh...and do not forget the television crews and radio stations who let the public know that the police need information and ask the public for their assistance! <<<

Sharon Coutinho said yesterday her family had not been contacted by psychic Debbie Malone and had no interest in speaking to her about her alleged insight into the murder of Mrs Rayney.

>>>Of course she has not been contacted, Debbie specifically states in her book that she does not contact the family members, she is merely trying to assist as any good citizen would /should do!<<<

Malone has claimed to have been in contact with Mrs Rayney since her death and that she had assisted police investigating the case. WA Police have not denied her claims.

>>>Police will not confirm or deny anything and from their point of view...it is the wise thing to do.<<<

Mrs Coutinho said her family had been contacted by several psychics since Mrs Rayney’s death but had declined their offers of help.

>>>And ofcourse that is their good right!<<<

She said she had read the extract from Malone’s new book which addressed the Rayney case but it had offered no new information.

>>>Ofcourse it offers no new information! As Debbie said...the police are still investigating and therefore she will not put any new information in her book. Again a wise thing to do as any new information has to be investigated first before it can be made public!<<<

Mrs Coutinho was upset that Malone had used her sister’s murder as a means of publicising her book.

>>>Although I am sorry for the families loss. I do not share that opinion! In fact I find it repelling that a person can say such a thing while all other media (that is sold too) has been asking the publics help in solving this case!

“Everything she has said has been public knowledge for the last two years,” Mrs Coutinho said.

>>>No responsible, clear thinking person would publish new details without letting the police do their job first!<<<

“We are not bothering with psychics. Unless someone comes up with something that hasn’t been made public, it’s really not worth listening to.”

>>>The 'good' psychics do not approach families of victims they approach the police (if they have enough courage to tell the police what they know!)The family should indeed not be bothered with psychics...as it is a police job to determine fact from fiction.<<<

The father of Claremont serial killer victim Sarah Spiers also warned victims’ families not to listen to psychics, saying yesterday they fed off misery and drove him to a mental breakdown in 1996.

>>>It is truly sad to hear that!I know of a couple in the US who asked for the public's help in search of their missing daughter and they are very appreciative of every help they can get. Their daughter has not been found in five years and yet they are grateful for all the public support from the police, volunteers who go on searches, the psychics who work together with private investigators and the volunteers who do anything to get the publics attention to look out for her and provide information.They understand that ANY PUBLICITY could trigger SOMEONE to remember SOMETHING that might lead to their daughter!<<<

Don Spiers said up to 400 psychics and clairvoyants had contacted him since Sarah disappeared on January 27, 1996. They had offered false information but he had been so desperate to find his daughter that he had listened to them and often had followed their instructions.
The false hope they created had led him to have a breakdown late in 1996, when he had found himself sitting in an armchair at his home ripping chunks of hair from his scalp.

>>>I can only imagine his pain, but I do not think he can imagine the pain and frustration of those who seriously try to help and feel just as helpless. That includes all people who never showed their faces and never asked for anything....As for false hope; the police have not come up with anything either and they have tried their best too! I can understand that he'd need a scape-goat to direct all his anger and frustration at after all these years and that can't be the police, it can't be the person who was actually responsible for his daughter going missing...so it is directed at the persons who promised something they could not deliver...who have now become psychics in general. <<<

Mr Spiers said psychics like Malone had never proved to be effective and just deepened the anguish experienced by the families of victims.

>>>From my humble experience I know that is not true! As I am one of those 'Psychics like Malone' who have been effective in some cases! It doesn't mean I know everything...but I have occasionaly been able to provide useful leads! (OK and NOW accuse me that I am promoting myself!Only because I tell my story! Oh...sure I am now making a 'profit' of other people's misfortune, because their misfortune has become part of my nightmares and the victims pain has become part of my daily life...but hey...I just have to 'live with that'!)<<<

“They are like a cancer doctor who tells a cancer victim they can cure them, when they know they really can’t, just to get the victim’s money,” he said.

>>>As far as I know Debbie Malone has NEVER asked for money in Police cases!So comparing her and others to all those 'fake seers' who did; is absolutely unfair, inconsiderate and damaging! And I believe a public apology is in order here!! <<<

Police Commissioner Karl O’Callaghan said yesterday police had a policy of not seeking the help of psychics in their investigations.
“But that’s not to say that we don’t listen to people who phone up with information,” he said.

>>>Most police forces around the world have that policy. It is to provide a guard against the 'fruitcakes and fake seers' who are definately out there! Police look at facts...that is their job! And the psychic is nothing but a possible witness of a crime!It is as good as 'hear-say' but it can provide leads to facts that otherwise would not have been investigated!<<<

He refused to comment on Malone’s claims.
Malone was not available for comment yesterday.

>>>I can imagine why! It is very painful and demoralizing to hear that family of the deceased are not the least grateful that a member of the public is trying to help. Or that the case has been brought to the publics attention again, so what happened will not be forgotten and that there might be a chance on justice!<<<

Mrs Rayney disappeared on August 7 after leaving a bootscooting class in Bentley at 9pm. Her body was found nine days later after police followed a trail of mechanical fluid from her abandoned car in Subiaco to a bush grave in Kings Park.

>>>And again...anyone who knows something...should contact the Police!The Police are trained to 'filter' any crap that has been derived from reading news reports from possibly good information that needs to be investigated! <<<

PERTH
RONAN O’CONNELL

>>>Thank you! Ronan O'Connell...you are doing a great job! Thank you for letting the public know ....and I do not mind you getting paid for the job you do! It is MUCH APPRECIATED!

I know from experience that it takes a lot of courage from Psychics/Mediums/Clairvoyants to step up to the police and say: "I may have some information on a case you are working on.!"

I praise Debbie for her courage to tell her story...that is not just about Corrynn Rayney, but about Debbie's life story and all other cases in which she provided information!

Being a Psychic Medium is not easy...you do not really have a choice. You are damned if you do and damned if you don't. If you decide NOT to tell anyone...you will feel guilty for the rest of your life...

and if you DO decide to tell the police and let the public know that this is a possible way of gathering information on crimes in general you are being painted as 'trying to profit from the family’s grief'. While merely letting the public know part of your life. So a Psychic Medium is not supposed to tell the public of her perceived information on someone else.

But catagorically being publically accused of making a profit from other peoples misfortune because you are a psychic/medium is pure discrimination.

Also by making a public statement like that as a family member, you can now expect no more help from people who seriously have received any futher 'psychic' information. Like Debbie said: It might prove to be a complicated case...

My personal impression in general? Some people simply fear psychics as they might help reveal an inconvenient truth, therefore it would be an excellent plan to ridicule them in public so no one will listen to them.

(I'm lucky...the very few friends I have...have nothing to hide! Hehehe!)

Those who are really interested in solving crimes, will definately listen to any possible useful lead and INVESTIGATE. They will not dismiss any information before hand on the way it has been perceived as any detective will know that no witness statement is a 100% correct; as it is always based on the person's perception.

A Real Life Case - Arsonist Groningen

2009-01-05T04:53:00.000-08:00

Real Life Case

I rarely discuss any of my Psi or RV related ‘work’ especially when it comes to criminal cases. In order to let the Police and the Justice departments do their work, I will keep the information confidential. Yet there are many people who would actually like to know what it is I ‘got’ in the way of information as an example of this tool, which is understandable. But it would not be professional if I would risk a Police operation by leaking any information to the press that may or may not be correct!

As a psychic or a Remote Viewer, you do not give anything more than an indication of where to look for evidence. It is not up to the Remote Viewer or the Psychic to produce evidence! Producing evidence is up to the Police or Private Detectives.

In order to share the following story with you I have asked the Police Department involved if they had any objections in me publishing my story. They did not see any problems in the publication of my story, which will finally allow me to show the public what Psi or Remote Viewing can do!

Since August 2007 there was an arsonist at work in the small village of ‘t Zandt in Groningen – the Netherlands. For months the police were trying to catch this arsonist who was setting peoples, barns, sheds and abandoned houses on fire. In the village with no more than 900 inhabitants people started to get really frightened.

In November 2007 the Police requested the assistance of several specialized teams, military forces with night vision equipment and they called upon the public for any tips that could lead to the arrest of this arsonist. Insurance companies as well as the department for justice had set a reward for the ‘golden tip’ that could lead to the arrest of the person responsible. A close friend suggested I ‘look into’ this case and assisted the Police since they requested the help of the public.

At that time I lived in the Netherlands and I was in contact with a Remote Viewer in Australia who is now my husband. I decided to task him with the description of the nearest significant feature to the perpetrators residence. The police knew that this person had to live in the area or know and frequent it regularly.
I myself was very much ‘frontloaded’, since I knew I was looking for an arsonist in that area. This can be tricky since all information you do have, from the media or hear say, may play with your imagination instead of your original Psi signal. Fortunately I had never been to that part of the country before and that was helpful!

I told my friend I actually believed to have some contact with this target and we drove to the village of ‘t Zandt in Groningen. I realized how ‘ridiculous’ it must sound to the average down-to-earth detective and did not quite know how to start and explain how I obtained this information.

My friend and I were standing outside the improvised emergency police station that was set up in the community hall, when we noticed two men leave. I told my friend:” I need to speak to THEM!” But I did not take any action not being sure and I followed the procedure. We called in the station and I told the officers there I may have some information that could help them with the case. The officer offered us some coffee and said he needed to call his colleagues. He went outside with his mobile. The other police officer asked where he went, and I said he is going to call back the two detectives that just left. My details were taken by a kind female officer who was a bit shocked when I told her that I got this information from Psi and Remote Viewing. At that moment the detectives returned and then all the lights in the police station went out and only the officer with the laptop computer was still able to work, but so perplexed that it ‘spooked’ her. The detectives escorted us to the police station in Delfzijl and on our way to the station I took pictures of the ‘significant feature’ that was sketched by the Remote Viewer on the side of a road called Molenweg. It was later confirmed that the perpetrator did indeed live at the Molenweg.

I told the detective I had a possible name or initials of the suspect and a complete profile including a composition sketch of the possible perpetrator. I had a general job description and a possible indication of a significant feature near the house of the arsonist sketched by a Remote Viewer.

I also had perceived a logo of a Neptune fork that I could not place. I told the detective I tried to look for the logo on Google but with no luck. The detective enlightened me and said:”You passed that logo on your way to the police station. It indicates a specific tourist route in this region.”
I wanted to hand the detective my one sheet report, but he wanted to hear my story first. I told him about Remote Viewing and my usually spontaneous Psi events that have assisted police before.

I said I perceived the name Johann Sebastian Bach and I said I believed the arsonists name was Johan or like Johann and that the last name started with a B. The detective’s eyes lit up when I mentioned that, but he did not confirm or deny anything at that stage. I said that I believed the arsonist was likely to be between 20 and 35 years of age and he probably lives in a small dark messy room with magazines all over the place. From that room you can actually hear a train going by. This person also seemed to like music. I told him I perceived there was a white or light colored vannette involved, but I was not sure whether he was actually driving it. It felt like it had to do with delivery of some goods that appeared to me like white packaging with powered dry material that appeared to be like fibres of some kind. The Remote Viewer picked up on a bicycle next to the house. The arsonist turned out to be a newspaper delivery boy.
I gave the detective my improvised composite sketch and the descriptions.

Here was my session data:

Wednesday 21 November 2007

Target: Fire, locations, description arsonist, ’t Zandt Groningen Netherlands
Name starts with J.
Male age 20 – 35
Works near water..harbour industrial environment.
Movement energy.
Fire-water-burn music? Johan Sebastian Bach
Link to big fire in harbor...trigger? Eemshaven
Works there? Worked there? Frustration? Loosing job?
Transport

Home?
Room dark...Sounds like train/railroad nearby
A mess...magazines

Friday 23 November 2007

Target: Fire, locations, description arcenist, ‘t Zandt Groningen Netherlands

A cross...like religion...linked to church.
Transport light color vannette?
Delivery...cargo..transport...to Germany? German language
Face of a young man...(composite sketch impression..hair could be different style) music again...
Sign ‘Neptune fork” symbol / logo
White plastic...package...contains dry.. dusty.. material..cotton..fibers?

My friend asked if I could try a Geoscan and he explained to the detective that I had been able to precognitive locate events on a map before. But at that stage I said that would be as good as guessing, because I did not actually feel I could do that at that stage and that I might give it a try later.

I later tried the Geoscan and sent some possible coordinates to the police but I wasn’t too confident about them and I also tried to locate the things I perceived in the earlier sessions by using Google and I sent my findings to the detective. Unfortunately those findings were actually off track, since they were not directly perceived by Psi, but an interpretation of the things perceived by me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The arsonist was arrested and his name was indeed Johnny B.
A newspaper delivery boy from the village 't Zandt who lived with his parents at the Molenweg in the village.
At the time I provided the information the police already had him under surveillance as a possible suspect. The detective could not confirm or deny towards me at that time if the information I had given was correct.

Source: Screen shot from television interview

News Report:

Drugs or Magnetic Fields?

2009-01-02T16:18:00.000-08:00

I have watched a very good lecture given by Dr. Michael Persinger and I was impressed! Both Chemicals and Magnetic Fields seem to have a similar effect on the brain.

This is absolutely a very interesting topic!

Remote Viewing & Cognitive Science

2008-12-29T20:44:00.000-08:00

For those who are not familiar with Remote Viewing and the research of cognitive science. This video explains some of it very clearly.

New Year's resolution

2008-12-28T20:08:00.000-08:00

Well here is my New Year's Resolution...

Looking back on last year it started out positive with new ideas and plans coming to fruition. Unfortunately the last three months have been not very constructive and my world was shocked by several events that I did not see coming. (LOL : and I am supposed to be psychic!)

My main focus for next year will be on development, creativity, challenges, innovations and all other things that are constructive and inspiring.

I will be attending classes in Security, Investigations, Occupational Health and Safety, Law and Forensics in January and February 2009. Next to those classes I will look into Neuroscience and Quantum Physics not on a professional level but merely as a general interest.

I hope to be able to add at least 4 official certificates to my list within the first three months of next year and two licenses.

Next to those developments I will be enhancing my creative skills in dimensional design, sketching, photography and writing.

At the end of January or the beginning of February I will start working for my new employer. Which is another new challenge in the New Year.

I will shift my focus from the many negative aspects I have encountered in the last three months to the positive ones that will come on my path very soon.

Christmas in Blue

2008-12-23T18:32:00.000-08:00

Have a magical Christmas!

Professional or Wannabe

2008-12-22T02:20:00.000-08:00

How do you know whether a person is a good Remote Viewer or a good Psychic? Results of course! How well they have scored on average and how many times they have actually provided good information. Ok, that seems pretty clear, but what do they actually do with this information?

Let’s say a usually pretty accurate psychic has been asked to look into a criminal case. The psychic describes the possible perpetrator and is able to make a composite sketch. The psychic even picks up on a possible name.
What does that Psychic do?

1. Runs to the media with all this information and tell them that this person is the perpetrator? In order to prove to the public that they can actually help in criminal cases. OR
2. Go to the police with that information and give them the results of their psychic session and quietly leave, letting the police do their job. Not getting any recognition in the media but letting the police do their job and getting the person responsible arrested.

I can tell you for sure that option number 1 will definitely NOT be appreciated by the police. Since it is not helpful during an investigation to point out any possible suspects! The psychic forgets that what they have perceived is an indication (a strong indication at times) but not a fact until there is proof in the form of evidence. The psychic forgets that the suspect may just run if they have been pointed out in public, which is not helpful to the police at all! Or the public accusation can cause a rage or riot against this person, who may or may not be guilty! The psychic may create a couple of minutes of fame but they will never be asked to work on any police cases, their name will be blacklisted. And that is even worse if the psychic turns out to be wrong! They will create a bad name for the entire community by not thinking about the consequences of their actions. In worse case they could be arrested for obstruction of justice or sued for slander!

Option number 2 may not seem the most spectacular one and it may not create credentials instantly, but in the long run the people you work with will appreciate this approach much more than the wild accusations and media attention in option number 1. After all is said and done and the case is closed and there is no way your information can cause any harm by publishing, you can ask if it is ok to let the public know. Only the police can tell you whether it can’t interfere with the course of justice anymore. And yes, you do need to have patience!

That is the difference between a ‘professional’ approach and the ‘wild media circus’ approach.

We would all like acknowledgement for our contributions in certain cases and we would all like people saying well done...thanks for the help! But the most important thing is that you actually contributed to making this world a little bit safer and let other people do their job!

Colorful Session

2008-12-06T23:48:00.001-08:00

Here is a pretty colorful Psi Session I have done on the TKR website.

For those who have no idea how that works...here a quick explanation:

You press a button GO VIEW and a random task will be selected.
All the viewer gets to see is an Alpha-Numeric code as a task number.
When ready...you start to type up your impressions about the target photograph that is connected with this number.
When you are finished you can click for feedback.

All the data you have given is registered in a database, you cannot change it after seeing the feedback!

This is a Double Blind protocol! Meaning nobody around me knows what the target photograph is and I do not know either. I can only see it when I have indicated I have finished and nothing to add to the data.

This excludes any cheating by the viewers.

Being Realistic

2008-12-06T23:06:00.001-08:00

Not everybody appreciates me being realistic about Psi and Remote Viewing skills!

Some claim that they can pinpoint a person’s location within a radius of a hundred meters and they actually genuinely believe they can.

Well I would like to see the evidence of that session! If you ask the person who makes the claim where the evidence of this remarkable achievement is...it is getting awfully quiet.

If you ask HOW they achieved this supposed pinpointing of a location, it will be made clear that the technique used is propriety and that it will not be taught to anyone but a select group of people!

Although it is a good marketing technique, it is a shame people need to sell their product that way!

Since No Results or sessions have ever been displayed by these people...Not even just the good ones! I do not hold much credence in the claims of these people.

Personally I have only been able to precognitive locate events on a map three times successfully. This had nothing to do with locating objects or persons though. But I know it is possible to pretty accurately locate events on a map or even spontaneously perceive precognitive information through a map.

But making unsubstantiated claims of being able to locate an object or person within a radius of a hundred meters seems harmful to the reputation of the person and Remote Viewing / Psi in general.

How can people make those claims, without giving at least one successful example? It beats me!

I prefer the more realistic approach!

Locating things with Psi or Remote Viewing

2008-12-04T18:58:00.000-08:00

Many people believe that Psi or Remote Viewing is THE TOOL when it comes to locating things or other people. I am sorry to disillusion you but Psi and/or Remote Viewing are not a standalone tool to actually locate people and objects.

A Psi or RV session on itself means nothing at all! You need to be willing to do some ‘leg-work’ and/or have other experts in the field who help you find the location.

For example: You have been asked to locate a missing person.

First you have to establish if this person is alive or not. If the person is alive they may be hard to track since the person is likely to move around. Their current location could be a supermarket, their home, in a car. Now all these different impressions at different times give a pretty good indication that the person is alive. If the same image of a location or very similar environment keep appearing in the data, it is likely the person is deceased. It is never a foregone conclusion, since there is no proof. It is an indication!
Let’s say that the sessions indicate that the person is deceased or not moving. And in your session you get the impression of a forest area, winding roads a certain rock formation in what appears to you like a national park, with a dirt path and this person is behind the rock formation.
Now try and determine on a map where there is an area with these features. Even if you would be absolutely spot on correct about the entire location, trying to determine the exact location is a completely different story. There may be hundreds of rock formations, dozens of dirt paths and national parks or forests are everywhere.
But if you have good sketches and lots of details it may be very useful for search teams or trackers who know the area where the person disappeared. If they recognize the particular rock formation near a dirt path it would be worth while taking a look there.
For someone who knows that particular area as his own back pocket, it could be a recognizable feature. While to me, personally, I would not know where to start. It could be anywhere! And the information appears to be useless.
You do not know for sure if the info is 100% correct and what is recognizable to one person may mean nothing to another.

Now let’s say in the case of my ex-husband who did not come home in time from work one evening and did not call. If I feared he wasn’t ok, I would have started searching for him between his workplace and home and since my vision presented a Shell logo, I would have checked all Shell petrol stations on his way from work to home. Since there were only 2 Shell petrol stations (one specifically on the route), I would have been able to find him within 20 minutes!

The only way I could have found him within 20 minutes, is because I know the area and I have additional information (the fact that he left from work and the locations of the Shell Stations).
You can only determine the information was actually correct if the case is solved. (Like my ex-husband who confirmed he went to get some fuel at the shell Station.)The solved cases contribute to the estimation of your own accuracy. It is not even important who actually solved the case or how it was solved. It is important to learn that the data you perceived was correct or not! That gives you (and others) a pretty good indication of the chances of the unknown quantity to be correct or not.

An indication could be a lead to evidence and proof. Without any indication, we would not know where to start in most cases.

Fact remains: “You don’t know the full story....’til you know the full story!”
“You can’t jump to conclusions.” And “What appears to be worthless and unrecognizable to you may be valuable information to others.”

Joe McMonEagle has pointed out in one of his books that it is very important to keep a log or journal of all you Psi related events and experiences. It is a valuable tip! And although it is hard to keep track of all those thing next to your daily business, it is the most important thing.
There is only one thing that serves you better than memory and that is your journal!

Questions and Answers about my Psi abilities

2008-12-03T20:39:00.000-08:00

Can you always use your Psi abilities on command?
Well the simple answer is NO! It all depends on my state of mind (alpha state or not). It depends on my thinking...I should not really be pre-occupied with any distracting thoughts, worries or fears of my own. It will not work on a day I have a dentist appointment, since at that time I am too pre-occupied with my own stress, nerves and fears. And it will not work on days when I have to concentrate on complicated jobs that require my full attention. And there needs to be some kind of link in the form of a strong thought that is then released.
Do you look in on anyone?
No, sorry, I have never been a person for ‘soap-operas’. I only use it if I feel someone could be in trouble or is in need of help and all other means of contact fail.
Do you unintentionally pick up on people?
Yes, I do at times. Especially when emotions are high I seem to be sensitive to that.
Do you tell others what you perceive about other people?
I will give examples, but I will not use any names unless I have permission to do so. Since I would not like others to talk about me either and everyone has a right to privacy I do not give any names or specifics.

The only exception to my rule is if I have a serious reason to believe someone has committed a crime, but even then I would like to be able to give some supporting evidence to the police before starting to accuse someone on the bases of a vision or a dream.

Like any other good citizen I would report it to the police if I think it is important. But like I said, I would only report to the police and I will not tell other people names or detailed facts, since that could jeopardize or obstruct the Police investigation.
Do you give psychic readings for other people?
No, I do not generally give readings for other people. I do not want to be pressured or having to live up to any of the other people’s expectations. Paid or non paid readings always have people expecting something from you at that time and place.
For me that is not realistic and not how it works. I do not want to feel obligated to give them at least something...since they expect it or have paid for it.

Like I said the stress of feeling obligated to ‘deliver’ is a No Go for me! On the rare occasion that I do give a reading I ask the people only not to have any expectations and to accept that I am a human being and not some kind of magic box or a TV that can switch on or off.
Do you do a lot of the Military Remote Viewing style?
Actually no... I have learned structure and practiced the protocols. I see them as a very valuable tool for research and development of Psi-abilities in a laboratory environment.

They are also very useful when working with a team and comparing the teams data, since they all use the same structure and protocol. But to me personally the structure is very limiting. The speed in which the information is processed in my mind does not allow me to take the time and write down everything in a certain order and structure. I do not want to think about... the category tangibles or intangibles, is this AI or EI. It takes too long and throws me off the target. I think I am better off using a MP3 or tape recorder to describe what I perceive.
Is there anything you don’t like about the Military Style Remote Viewing?
Well, the fact that you are not allowed to describe with any other words than the general descriptor list and everything else has to be declared AOL (Analytical Overlay), still bugs me.

The general descriptions can apply to so many things that if you name enough general colours, textures, smells and temperatures. You are bound to get some right. Something brown, flat, horizontal, smooth, wooden; could be the table I am working on right now or the jetty in the harbour or the floor at my friend’s place, perhaps the cutting board of the chef who works in the kitchen of a nearby restaurant or the desk in the lawyer’s office. The general descriptors are there to prevent you from jumping to conclusions, but they also limit you from giving more precise details.

For people who have already developed their natural Psychic talents and want to use it in a practical sense, the Remote Viewing protocols take up too much time and limit your free expression of perceived data.

For people who want to test and develop their own innate Psychic abilities...learn the Remote Viewing structure and protocols! It will not only prove you can do it, you will also let you discover your own strengths and weaknesses within this field and it will give you a fair indication of how good you actually are at using your Psi abilities.

Quantum Non-Local Awareness

2008-12-03T20:19:00.000-08:00

About 20 years ago...I was 15 at the time I experienced what Remote Viewers call Bi-Location and what Quantum Physicists call Quantum Non-Locality.
It all started out in the kitchen of my parents place. I was not doing anything interesting, just putting the dishes in the dishwasher when I suddenly got this image in my head of a school teacher of mine standing at the side of a desolate road near a ditch and he was kicking his car! It felt like I was watching him from above and I could see fields, a farm and a mill in the distance.
The image felt and seemed so real, it was like I was there, while I knew I was doing the dishes at home! I dismissed it as daydreaming, but my curiosity tempted me to ask him the next time we would meet.

The next day at school I asked what was wrong with his car the evening before and why he kicked it. He was absolutely stunned! “There was no one there...you could not have seen that!” he cried out. And so I explained to him what happened that evening at the time I was filling the dishwasher.

I was actually at two places at the same time! Functioning on a simple level in one dimension, while observing what was going on simultaneously in another dimension approximately 80km from where I physically was at that time! I could perceive everything except sound.
While describing the scenery to the teacher he became more and more intrigued, as I could not only tell him what he was doing at that time but also where he was and what the environment looked like. And I was surprised that he confirmed all of it, as to be exactly what happened.
I thought it was a one off event, just some kind of strange coincidence. I had absolutely no explanation for what had happened! But it made quite an impression on me and the teacher, who had also studied Psychology and suggested I’d read Jung’s work.

Jung was talking about a collective unconscious. To me it sounded like a weird theory, but it seemed to be the only logical explanation for what had happened.

Years later I had a discussion with a colleague at work about this. On the radio news it was announced that funding was given to ESP research. And she replied:”What a waste of money! There is no such thing!” I carefully replied:”Yes, there is! And it is important that they look into this.” She laughed and said:” You don’t believe in this Hocus-Pocus do you?” Then I confessed that I have actually experienced it firsthand!

She challenged me and I accepted, although I had no idea whether I could do this ‘on command’ or not. I focused on her for the first couple of days of the week and then I actually forgot about it. Yet that Friday evening, I got this vision in my head. She was screaming and yelling at a lady sitting on a sofa. I could not hear what it was about because there was no sound. I could see the entire room! My colleague, left the room and slammed the door behind her, went through a hall way and turned right to go up stairs. There she went into a room with a white door on the right. There I lost the image.

That Monday I told her what had happened that Friday night and I described her mother, the living room in her house, the interior design and the location of her room upstairs. Unfortunately my colleague freaked out! She tried to avoid me and I felt she suddenly feared me. She asked:”What else do you know?” I said:”Nothing! I only know you have had an argument with your mother Friday night! That’s it! I do not even know what it was about and I don’t want to.” “You asked me if I could use ESP and to prove it is real!” “YOU wanted THIS!” I replied. “Now that I gave you your proof, you think I’m a spy or a freak!” We never discussed the subject again. But I learned my lesson.

It occurred to me that some factors are important to trigger this ‘Bi-location’ (for me personally). Although it doesn’t feel like telepathy (I am not perceiving anything through their eyes) it seems I have to establish some kind of link or relationship with the person (who functions as a beacon). The ‘signal or signature’ of this particular person only stands out when there is a true and serious emotional peak, like anger, frustration, fear or panic. And at the time the emotional peak takes place I have to be doing something that does not require a lot of my attention, like driving on a long road, doing the dishes, cleaning or other repetitive simple work. These are activities that, I now know take you more easily into the meditative Alpha State. It also seems important to think about that person for a while and then let it go... (Meaning: Not thinking about the person at all and just doing other things.)

One day my ex-husband was not home from work at the time he should be. He did not call and I could not reach him on his mobile. After an hour or so I got worried and I decided if all technology failed, I might try a different type of contact.

I pictured him in my mind and asked the questions:”Where are you? What are you doing?” Then I went to do the dishes, because I already had dinner by myself. Shortly after that I got a picture of him walking on the side of the road with something in his hand and I saw a bright lit Shell logo that he was walking towards in the dark.

An hour later he arrived home. And before he could apologize, I told him what I had perceived. He was indeed without fuel and he did walk along the road to get some fuel at a Shell Station. He was frustrated at the time. Again I perceived everything from a bird’s eye point of view.

Does it always have to be a personal link or contact? Or can it be contact with a person though other forms of communication?

I had a very good internet contact with a person on the other side of the world. We talked about the possibilities of ESP and what we could do. I told him I could see in distant locations at times and pick up on things that are there around the person. He asked me to tell him what I could pick up on his location. I asked him twice that he would not freak out and he assured me he would not.

I described the area where he was, his house and even the medication he was taking at that time and that it was stored in a medicine cabinet. I could even read part of the prescription on the bottle. This got him really enthusiastic, since he could only confirm I was correct. I even described some old medication that he did not use anymore, but was still in the cabinet. I had never met him in person or been to his country before and we had never talked on the phone at that stage. Later we did have some phone conversations and I went to visit him. Again this was a form of Bi-Location, although not as strong as with heavy emotional peak and a more personal connection.

It clearly shows to me that there is some kind of connection on another level. Perhaps it is the quantum level? It is definitely something we cannot perceive with the naked eye or measure proprely yet. (I believe we soon will be able to measure the effects.) There is definitely some kind of signal in the ‘air’ that I am able to pick up on that activates some kind of chemicals in my brain or body that allow me to perceive things beyond the normal five senses that are at a distant location and on verification turn out to be perceived correct.

Perhaps the ‘carrier wave of Psi’ scientists are looking for is the supposed Quantum wave-particle duality.

This would suggest that any kind of Remote Viewing IS a form of Remote Influencing...Since a Remote Viewer is observing in two places at the same time. If you are able to divide your attention in two places at the same time and observe (Bi-location) you are making the wave function collapse in two different places simultaneously through a form of entanglement on a different level.

On several occasion the indications of something actually happening at the Remote Viewed location has been registered. Ingo Swan perturbed the highly sensitive Magnetometer in a vault under the floor, simply by Remote Viewing it. The Chinese have reported that photon particles instantly appear near the object that is Remote Viewed and random event generators seem to be influenced when someone is Remote Viewing and on target.

Literally meaning: making Psi contact can be measured.

Missing Persons

2008-12-02T00:21:00.000-08:00

The last couple of weeks I have been very down and depressed. I had been reading some news articles about Psychics looking for missing persons and bothering the families with ‘false hope’.
I really thought: “ I give up!”

Together with my partner, I have spent every bit of free time I have on looking into missing person cases. Going out there on our own expenses, to verify what I/we have perceived is correct and if we can find more clues. We spend hours driving around in areas that we have never seen before, hoping to pick up on a trace. We have been walking miles along roads and desolate places, looking for clues. We never ask for anything...and we never bother anyone until we actually have found some evidence.

But what do I read on-line and in the papers? Psychics are only out there to make a buck on other people’s misery and misfortune! And if they are not... they will do it for their own fame and fortune!

Guess who wrote the criticism... The editor/proprietor of the Post Newspaper group...It really struck me with the feeling: “Look who’s talking!” Making money over other peoples misery and misfortune...”How do you think the Post Newspaper Group got so big?”

Claiming that every Psychic is a fake because they have not found Sarah Spiers? Well, guess what...I’m Psychic and I haven’t got a clue where she is...neither have the police. Should we now, as good sceptics, conclude the Police do not have any real Detectives? Get serious!

It really hit me right in the heart! But hey...everyone is entitled to an opinion...even if it’s a biased one. It just really made me feel absolutely miserable.

Fortunately there are many other people, family and friends who are really appreciative of all the help they get from complete strangers who start helping by looking out for their loved ones in any way they can.

I will not be wasting my time, effort and money on finding people whom families obviously do not appreciate any help at all.

In all the cases I have worked on...some successful and some not...people thanked me for the effort and the help. Whether it were police detectives, investigators, the persons family or other people involved they always were very appreciative and surprised that there are people in this world who really only want to help other people.

I recently got an email from a US based investigator / Remote Viewer who thanked me about four times in one email for my work, effort and input in the case he is working on. He also stated that it helps and comforts the family to know that people from all around the world try to help and find their loved one! Also that he and his team are now even more inspired to get this case solved for the family. That means a lot to me!

Today I went on a search for a missing child, because I have an idea of where she might be. I drove approx. 200km and I accidentally wrecked my partner’s car mirror. Fortunately no one got hurt and the other car was not damaged. But my effort to find this girl today has cost me more than 200km of fuel and 4 hours of my time.

Yet...I will not give up! It could have been me..or my child! And I would appreciate all the help I could get in that case!

Psychic Development in Western Australia

2008-11-16T18:44:00.000-08:00

I have done some research over the last couple of months on Psychic Development in Western Australia. There are over a 100 psychic's / mediums listed, advertising and/or practicing in Western Australia. There are likely to be more who do not advertize. Over 25% of the population of 2.1 milion inhabitants have consulted a psychic or medium. Many of the psychics/ mediums are connected to spiritualist churches.

The number of people who discover their abilities is growing.

Yet there is no formal education to be found on the subject of parapsychology in any of the Universities in WA. No research has been done in this field. The closest I could find was 'cognitive science', yet that did not include extra sensory perception!

How can it be that this field is so largely ignored? While it is integrated throughout the society in the countless spritual churches, spiritual counselers, psychics and mediums.

Psi Practice

2008-11-16T05:57:00.001-08:00

In order to test and practice my Psi abilities I use the website Tenthousandroads.com where after registering you can log-in to the Dojo. This amazing piece of programming work (by PJ)allows Remote Viewers and Psychics to 'play' with their skills.

The software appoints a code to a picture target. All the Remote Viewer gets to see is the alpha numeric code. The viewer is totally blind to the target. It could be a picture of anything!

After finishing the session, you can view the feedback. There is no way you can add anything after viewing the feedback! You can decide to make your sessions public or keep them private.

Here is an example of the feedback on a recent session.

This is just a quick 5 minute Psi impression. A Remote Viewing session will take longer and involves sketching and the full descriptions of colors, textures, tastes, smells, temperatures, dimensions, aestethic impact, emotional impact and at times even the phonetics of names of places and people present in the picture.

If you are on signal line and you can achieve this result in five minutes...what would a person be able to reach in 45 minutes to an hour?

Research and Intuition

2008-11-15T17:48:00.000-08:00

Ever since I can remember I have always been torn between actual proof and intuition.
Simply stated ‘You know it is true, but you do not have the means to prove it!’

The logical ‘down to earth’ person in me says intuition is fine...but where are the facts? If something happens to me several times in a row, I can see that as a pattern. Yet others may dismiss it as pure coincidence. Still, I can’t dismiss the pattern, simply because I observed it!

I had discovered such a pattern in Remote Viewing. At times I was able to tell whether I was ‘on’ or ‘off’ target. According to a well respected Remote Viewing Trainer, that was impossible! Remote Viewing holds a strict protocol, and you are not allowed to ‘think’ about the target.
He said:”If you say you know you are on or off target, you are thinking!”

I disputed that I was thinking. In my case I feel the signal line! I recognize the feeling of what it is like to be on target. If that particular feeling is not there...I just know my session will be a waste of paper! There is no reason to continue.

I agree you have to be careful not to misinterpret your own possible insecurity, especially when you just start to use your Psi-talents. Yet, I have over 20 years of experience with natural Psi, I know by now the difference between fantasy, memory and Psi-events.

Knowing or feeling when you are ‘on’ or ‘off’ target is a very, very valuable tool! Since you can actually separate the junk from the real thing it improves the accuracy dramatically!
It doesn’t mean that the session is always helpful in a practical sense, but it does mean you can exclude most of the misses.

I believe it will not take long before researchers come up with evidence for my theory that experienced people can actually feel the signal line! And that the signal line is more than a theoretical name for something intangible, it is very real!

I know my intuition is right...all I have to do now it wait for the evidence to present itself.