Monday, December 29, 2008

Remote Viewing & Cognitive Science

For those who are not familiar with Remote Viewing and the research of cognitive science. This video explains some of it very clearly.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

New Year's resolution

Well here is my New Year's Resolution...

Looking back on last year it started out positive with new ideas and plans coming to fruition. Unfortunately the last three months have been not very constructive and my world was shocked by several events that I did not see coming. (LOL : and I am supposed to be psychic!)

My main focus for next year will be on development, creativity, challenges, innovations and all other things that are constructive and inspiring.

I will be attending classes in Security, Investigations, Occupational Health and Safety, Law and Forensics in January and February 2009. Next to those classes I will look into Neuroscience and Quantum Physics not on a professional level but merely as a general interest.

I hope to be able to add at least 4 official certificates to my list within the first three months of next year and two licenses.

Next to those developments I will be enhancing my creative skills in dimensional design, sketching, photography and writing.

At the end of January or the beginning of February I will start working for my new employer. Which is another new challenge in the New Year.

I will shift my focus from the many negative aspects I have encountered in the last three months to the positive ones that will come on my path very soon.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Christmas in Blue

merry christmas

Have a magical Christmas!

Monday, December 22, 2008

Professional or Wannabe

How do you know whether a person is a good Remote Viewer or a good Psychic? Results of course! How well they have scored on average and how many times they have actually provided good information. Ok, that seems pretty clear, but what do they actually do with this information?

Let’s say a usually pretty accurate psychic has been asked to look into a criminal case. The psychic describes the possible perpetrator and is able to make a composite sketch. The psychic even picks up on a possible name.
What does that Psychic do?

1. Runs to the media with all this information and tell them that this person is the perpetrator? In order to prove to the public that they can actually help in criminal cases. OR
2. Go to the police with that information and give them the results of their psychic session and quietly leave, letting the police do their job. Not getting any recognition in the media but letting the police do their job and getting the person responsible arrested.

I can tell you for sure that option number 1 will definitely NOT be appreciated by the police. Since it is not helpful during an investigation to point out any possible suspects! The psychic forgets that what they have perceived is an indication (a strong indication at times) but not a fact until there is proof in the form of evidence. The psychic forgets that the suspect may just run if they have been pointed out in public, which is not helpful to the police at all! Or the public accusation can cause a rage or riot against this person, who may or may not be guilty! The psychic may create a couple of minutes of fame but they will never be asked to work on any police cases, their name will be blacklisted. And that is even worse if the psychic turns out to be wrong! They will create a bad name for the entire community by not thinking about the consequences of their actions. In worse case they could be arrested for obstruction of justice or sued for slander!

Option number 2 may not seem the most spectacular one and it may not create credentials instantly, but in the long run the people you work with will appreciate this approach much more than the wild accusations and media attention in option number 1. After all is said and done and the case is closed and there is no way your information can cause any harm by publishing, you can ask if it is ok to let the public know. Only the police can tell you whether it can’t interfere with the course of justice anymore. And yes, you do need to have patience!

That is the difference between a ‘professional’ approach and the ‘wild media circus’ approach.

We would all like acknowledgement for our contributions in certain cases and we would all like people saying well done...thanks for the help! But the most important thing is that you actually contributed to making this world a little bit safer and let other people do their job!

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Colorful Session

colorful balloons

Here is a pretty colorful Psi Session I have done on the TKR website.

For those who have no idea how that works...here a quick explanation:

You press a button GO VIEW and a random task will be selected.
All the viewer gets to see is an Alpha-Numeric code as a task number.
When ready...you start to type up your impressions about the target photograph that is connected with this number.
When you are finished you can click for feedback.

All the data you have given is registered in a database, you cannot change it after seeing the feedback!

This is a Double Blind protocol! Meaning nobody around me knows what the target photograph is and I do not know either. I can only see it when I have indicated I have finished and nothing to add to the data.

This excludes any cheating by the viewers.

Being Realistic

Not everybody appreciates me being realistic about Psi and Remote Viewing skills!

Some claim that they can pinpoint a person’s location within a radius of a hundred meters and they actually genuinely believe they can.

Well I would like to see the evidence of that session! If you ask the person who makes the claim where the evidence of this remarkable achievement is...it is getting awfully quiet.

If you ask HOW they achieved this supposed pinpointing of a location, it will be made clear that the technique used is propriety and that it will not be taught to anyone but a select group of people!

Although it is a good marketing technique, it is a shame people need to sell their product that way!

Since No Results or sessions have ever been displayed by these people...Not even just the good ones! I do not hold much credence in the claims of these people.

Personally I have only been able to precognitive locate events on a map three times successfully. This had nothing to do with locating objects or persons though. But I know it is possible to pretty accurately locate events on a map or even spontaneously perceive precognitive information through a map.

But making unsubstantiated claims of being able to locate an object or person within a radius of a hundred meters seems harmful to the reputation of the person and Remote Viewing / Psi in general.

How can people make those claims, without giving at least one successful example? It beats me!

I prefer the more realistic approach!

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Locating things with Psi or Remote Viewing

Many people believe that Psi or Remote Viewing is THE TOOL when it comes to locating things or other people. I am sorry to disillusion you but Psi and/or Remote Viewing are not a standalone tool to actually locate people and objects.

A Psi or RV session on itself means nothing at all! You need to be willing to do some ‘leg-work’ and/or have other experts in the field who help you find the location.

For example: You have been asked to locate a missing person.
  • First you have to establish if this person is alive or not. If the person is alive they may be hard to track since the person is likely to move around. Their current location could be a supermarket, their home, in a car. Now all these different impressions at different times give a pretty good indication that the person is alive. If the same image of a location or very similar environment keep appearing in the data, it is likely the person is deceased. It is never a foregone conclusion, since there is no proof. It is an indication!
  • Let’s say that the sessions indicate that the person is deceased or not moving. And in your session you get the impression of a forest area, winding roads a certain rock formation in what appears to you like a national park, with a dirt path and this person is behind the rock formation.
  • Now try and determine on a map where there is an area with these features. Even if you would be absolutely spot on correct about the entire location, trying to determine the exact location is a completely different story. There may be hundreds of rock formations, dozens of dirt paths and national parks or forests are everywhere.
  • But if you have good sketches and lots of details it may be very useful for search teams or trackers who know the area where the person disappeared. If they recognize the particular rock formation near a dirt path it would be worth while taking a look there.
  • For someone who knows that particular area as his own back pocket, it could be a recognizable feature. While to me, personally, I would not know where to start. It could be anywhere! And the information appears to be useless.
  • You do not know for sure if the info is 100% correct and what is recognizable to one person may mean nothing to another.


Now let’s say in the case of my ex-husband who did not come home in time from work one evening and did not call. If I feared he wasn’t ok, I would have started searching for him between his workplace and home and since my vision presented a Shell logo, I would have checked all Shell petrol stations on his way from work to home. Since there were only 2 Shell petrol stations (one specifically on the route), I would have been able to find him within 20 minutes!


The only way I could have found him within 20 minutes, is because I know the area and I have additional information (the fact that he left from work and the locations of the Shell Stations).
You can only determine the information was actually correct if the case is solved. (Like my ex-husband who confirmed he went to get some fuel at the shell Station.)The solved cases contribute to the estimation of your own accuracy. It is not even important who actually solved the case or how it was solved. It is important to learn that the data you perceived was correct or not! That gives you (and others) a pretty good indication of the chances of the unknown quantity to be correct or not.


An indication could be a lead to evidence and proof. Without any indication, we would not know where to start in most cases.


Fact remains: “You don’t know the full story....’til you know the full story!”
“You can’t jump to conclusions.” And “What appears to be worthless and unrecognizable to you may be valuable information to others.”


Joe McMonEagle has pointed out in one of his books that it is very important to keep a log or journal of all you Psi related events and experiences. It is a valuable tip! And although it is hard to keep track of all those thing next to your daily business, it is the most important thing.
There is only one thing that serves you better than memory and that is your journal!