For those who are not familiar with Remote Viewing and the research of cognitive science. This video explains some of it very clearly.
Showing posts with label Viewing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viewing. Show all posts
Monday, December 29, 2008
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Colorful Session
Here is a pretty colorful Psi Session I have done on the TKR website.
For those who have no idea how that works...here a quick explanation:
You press a button GO VIEW and a random task will be selected.
All the viewer gets to see is an Alpha-Numeric code as a task number.
When ready...you start to type up your impressions about the target photograph that is connected with this number.
When you are finished you can click for feedback.
All the data you have given is registered in a database, you cannot change it after seeing the feedback!
This is a Double Blind protocol! Meaning nobody around me knows what the target photograph is and I do not know either. I can only see it when I have indicated I have finished and nothing to add to the data.
This excludes any cheating by the viewers.
Being Realistic
Not everybody appreciates me being realistic about Psi and Remote Viewing skills!
Some claim that they can pinpoint a person’s location within a radius of a hundred meters and they actually genuinely believe they can.
Well I would like to see the evidence of that session! If you ask the person who makes the claim where the evidence of this remarkable achievement is...it is getting awfully quiet.
If you ask HOW they achieved this supposed pinpointing of a location, it will be made clear that the technique used is propriety and that it will not be taught to anyone but a select group of people!
Although it is a good marketing technique, it is a shame people need to sell their product that way!
Since No Results or sessions have ever been displayed by these people...Not even just the good ones! I do not hold much credence in the claims of these people.
Personally I have only been able to precognitive locate events on a map three times successfully. This had nothing to do with locating objects or persons though. But I know it is possible to pretty accurately locate events on a map or even spontaneously perceive precognitive information through a map.
But making unsubstantiated claims of being able to locate an object or person within a radius of a hundred meters seems harmful to the reputation of the person and Remote Viewing / Psi in general.
How can people make those claims, without giving at least one successful example? It beats me!
I prefer the more realistic approach!
Some claim that they can pinpoint a person’s location within a radius of a hundred meters and they actually genuinely believe they can.
Well I would like to see the evidence of that session! If you ask the person who makes the claim where the evidence of this remarkable achievement is...it is getting awfully quiet.
If you ask HOW they achieved this supposed pinpointing of a location, it will be made clear that the technique used is propriety and that it will not be taught to anyone but a select group of people!
Although it is a good marketing technique, it is a shame people need to sell their product that way!
Since No Results or sessions have ever been displayed by these people...Not even just the good ones! I do not hold much credence in the claims of these people.
Personally I have only been able to precognitive locate events on a map three times successfully. This had nothing to do with locating objects or persons though. But I know it is possible to pretty accurately locate events on a map or even spontaneously perceive precognitive information through a map.
But making unsubstantiated claims of being able to locate an object or person within a radius of a hundred meters seems harmful to the reputation of the person and Remote Viewing / Psi in general.
How can people make those claims, without giving at least one successful example? It beats me!
I prefer the more realistic approach!
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Questions and Answers about my Psi abilities
- Can you always use your Psi abilities on command?
Well the simple answer is NO! It all depends on my state of mind (alpha state or not). It depends on my thinking...I should not really be pre-occupied with any distracting thoughts, worries or fears of my own. It will not work on a day I have a dentist appointment, since at that time I am too pre-occupied with my own stress, nerves and fears. And it will not work on days when I have to concentrate on complicated jobs that require my full attention. And there needs to be some kind of link in the form of a strong thought that is then released. - Do you look in on anyone?
No, sorry, I have never been a person for ‘soap-operas’. I only use it if I feel someone could be in trouble or is in need of help and all other means of contact fail. - Do you unintentionally pick up on people?
Yes, I do at times. Especially when emotions are high I seem to be sensitive to that. - Do you tell others what you perceive about other people?
I will give examples, but I will not use any names unless I have permission to do so. Since I would not like others to talk about me either and everyone has a right to privacy I do not give any names or specifics.
The only exception to my rule is if I have a serious reason to believe someone has committed a crime, but even then I would like to be able to give some supporting evidence to the police before starting to accuse someone on the bases of a vision or a dream.
Like any other good citizen I would report it to the police if I think it is important. But like I said, I would only report to the police and I will not tell other people names or detailed facts, since that could jeopardize or obstruct the Police investigation. - Do you give psychic readings for other people?
No, I do not generally give readings for other people. I do not want to be pressured or having to live up to any of the other people’s expectations. Paid or non paid readings always have people expecting something from you at that time and place.
For me that is not realistic and not how it works. I do not want to feel obligated to give them at least something...since they expect it or have paid for it.
Like I said the stress of feeling obligated to ‘deliver’ is a No Go for me! On the rare occasion that I do give a reading I ask the people only not to have any expectations and to accept that I am a human being and not some kind of magic box or a TV that can switch on or off. - Do you do a lot of the Military Remote Viewing style?
Actually no... I have learned structure and practiced the protocols. I see them as a very valuable tool for research and development of Psi-abilities in a laboratory environment.
They are also very useful when working with a team and comparing the teams data, since they all use the same structure and protocol. But to me personally the structure is very limiting. The speed in which the information is processed in my mind does not allow me to take the time and write down everything in a certain order and structure. I do not want to think about... the category tangibles or intangibles, is this AI or EI. It takes too long and throws me off the target. I think I am better off using a MP3 or tape recorder to describe what I perceive. - Is there anything you don’t like about the Military Style Remote Viewing?
Well, the fact that you are not allowed to describe with any other words than the general descriptor list and everything else has to be declared AOL (Analytical Overlay), still bugs me.
The general descriptions can apply to so many things that if you name enough general colours, textures, smells and temperatures. You are bound to get some right. Something brown, flat, horizontal, smooth, wooden; could be the table I am working on right now or the jetty in the harbour or the floor at my friend’s place, perhaps the cutting board of the chef who works in the kitchen of a nearby restaurant or the desk in the lawyer’s office. The general descriptors are there to prevent you from jumping to conclusions, but they also limit you from giving more precise details.
For people who have already developed their natural Psychic talents and want to use it in a practical sense, the Remote Viewing protocols take up too much time and limit your free expression of perceived data.
For people who want to test and develop their own innate Psychic abilities...learn the Remote Viewing structure and protocols! It will not only prove you can do it, you will also let you discover your own strengths and weaknesses within this field and it will give you a fair indication of how good you actually are at using your Psi abilities.
Quantum Non-Local Awareness
About 20 years ago...I was 15 at the time I experienced what Remote Viewers call Bi-Location and what Quantum Physicists call Quantum Non-Locality.
It all started out in the kitchen of my parents place. I was not doing anything interesting, just putting the dishes in the dishwasher when I suddenly got this image in my head of a school teacher of mine standing at the side of a desolate road near a ditch and he was kicking his car! It felt like I was watching him from above and I could see fields, a farm and a mill in the distance.
The image felt and seemed so real, it was like I was there, while I knew I was doing the dishes at home! I dismissed it as daydreaming, but my curiosity tempted me to ask him the next time we would meet.
The next day at school I asked what was wrong with his car the evening before and why he kicked it. He was absolutely stunned! “There was no one there...you could not have seen that!” he cried out. And so I explained to him what happened that evening at the time I was filling the dishwasher.
I was actually at two places at the same time! Functioning on a simple level in one dimension, while observing what was going on simultaneously in another dimension approximately 80km from where I physically was at that time! I could perceive everything except sound.
While describing the scenery to the teacher he became more and more intrigued, as I could not only tell him what he was doing at that time but also where he was and what the environment looked like. And I was surprised that he confirmed all of it, as to be exactly what happened.
I thought it was a one off event, just some kind of strange coincidence. I had absolutely no explanation for what had happened! But it made quite an impression on me and the teacher, who had also studied Psychology and suggested I’d read Jung’s work.
Jung was talking about a collective unconscious. To me it sounded like a weird theory, but it seemed to be the only logical explanation for what had happened.
Years later I had a discussion with a colleague at work about this. On the radio news it was announced that funding was given to ESP research. And she replied:”What a waste of money! There is no such thing!” I carefully replied:”Yes, there is! And it is important that they look into this.” She laughed and said:” You don’t believe in this Hocus-Pocus do you?” Then I confessed that I have actually experienced it firsthand!
She challenged me and I accepted, although I had no idea whether I could do this ‘on command’ or not. I focused on her for the first couple of days of the week and then I actually forgot about it. Yet that Friday evening, I got this vision in my head. She was screaming and yelling at a lady sitting on a sofa. I could not hear what it was about because there was no sound. I could see the entire room! My colleague, left the room and slammed the door behind her, went through a hall way and turned right to go up stairs. There she went into a room with a white door on the right. There I lost the image.
That Monday I told her what had happened that Friday night and I described her mother, the living room in her house, the interior design and the location of her room upstairs. Unfortunately my colleague freaked out! She tried to avoid me and I felt she suddenly feared me. She asked:”What else do you know?” I said:”Nothing! I only know you have had an argument with your mother Friday night! That’s it! I do not even know what it was about and I don’t want to.” “You asked me if I could use ESP and to prove it is real!” “YOU wanted THIS!” I replied. “Now that I gave you your proof, you think I’m a spy or a freak!” We never discussed the subject again. But I learned my lesson.
It occurred to me that some factors are important to trigger this ‘Bi-location’ (for me personally). Although it doesn’t feel like telepathy (I am not perceiving anything through their eyes) it seems I have to establish some kind of link or relationship with the person (who functions as a beacon). The ‘signal or signature’ of this particular person only stands out when there is a true and serious emotional peak, like anger, frustration, fear or panic. And at the time the emotional peak takes place I have to be doing something that does not require a lot of my attention, like driving on a long road, doing the dishes, cleaning or other repetitive simple work. These are activities that, I now know take you more easily into the meditative Alpha State. It also seems important to think about that person for a while and then let it go... (Meaning: Not thinking about the person at all and just doing other things.)
One day my ex-husband was not home from work at the time he should be. He did not call and I could not reach him on his mobile. After an hour or so I got worried and I decided if all technology failed, I might try a different type of contact.
I pictured him in my mind and asked the questions:”Where are you? What are you doing?” Then I went to do the dishes, because I already had dinner by myself. Shortly after that I got a picture of him walking on the side of the road with something in his hand and I saw a bright lit Shell logo that he was walking towards in the dark.
An hour later he arrived home. And before he could apologize, I told him what I had perceived. He was indeed without fuel and he did walk along the road to get some fuel at a Shell Station. He was frustrated at the time. Again I perceived everything from a bird’s eye point of view.
Does it always have to be a personal link or contact? Or can it be contact with a person though other forms of communication?
I had a very good internet contact with a person on the other side of the world. We talked about the possibilities of ESP and what we could do. I told him I could see in distant locations at times and pick up on things that are there around the person. He asked me to tell him what I could pick up on his location. I asked him twice that he would not freak out and he assured me he would not.
I described the area where he was, his house and even the medication he was taking at that time and that it was stored in a medicine cabinet. I could even read part of the prescription on the bottle. This got him really enthusiastic, since he could only confirm I was correct. I even described some old medication that he did not use anymore, but was still in the cabinet. I had never met him in person or been to his country before and we had never talked on the phone at that stage. Later we did have some phone conversations and I went to visit him. Again this was a form of Bi-Location, although not as strong as with heavy emotional peak and a more personal connection.
It clearly shows to me that there is some kind of connection on another level. Perhaps it is the quantum level? It is definitely something we cannot perceive with the naked eye or measure proprely yet. (I believe we soon will be able to measure the effects.) There is definitely some kind of signal in the ‘air’ that I am able to pick up on that activates some kind of chemicals in my brain or body that allow me to perceive things beyond the normal five senses that are at a distant location and on verification turn out to be perceived correct.
Perhaps the ‘carrier wave of Psi’ scientists are looking for is the supposed Quantum wave-particle duality.
This would suggest that any kind of Remote Viewing IS a form of Remote Influencing...Since a Remote Viewer is observing in two places at the same time. If you are able to divide your attention in two places at the same time and observe (Bi-location) you are making the wave function collapse in two different places simultaneously through a form of entanglement on a different level.
On several occasion the indications of something actually happening at the Remote Viewed location has been registered. Ingo Swan perturbed the highly sensitive Magnetometer in a vault under the floor, simply by Remote Viewing it. The Chinese have reported that photon particles instantly appear near the object that is Remote Viewed and random event generators seem to be influenced when someone is Remote Viewing and on target.
Literally meaning: making Psi contact can be measured.
It all started out in the kitchen of my parents place. I was not doing anything interesting, just putting the dishes in the dishwasher when I suddenly got this image in my head of a school teacher of mine standing at the side of a desolate road near a ditch and he was kicking his car! It felt like I was watching him from above and I could see fields, a farm and a mill in the distance.
The image felt and seemed so real, it was like I was there, while I knew I was doing the dishes at home! I dismissed it as daydreaming, but my curiosity tempted me to ask him the next time we would meet.
The next day at school I asked what was wrong with his car the evening before and why he kicked it. He was absolutely stunned! “There was no one there...you could not have seen that!” he cried out. And so I explained to him what happened that evening at the time I was filling the dishwasher.
I was actually at two places at the same time! Functioning on a simple level in one dimension, while observing what was going on simultaneously in another dimension approximately 80km from where I physically was at that time! I could perceive everything except sound.
While describing the scenery to the teacher he became more and more intrigued, as I could not only tell him what he was doing at that time but also where he was and what the environment looked like. And I was surprised that he confirmed all of it, as to be exactly what happened.
I thought it was a one off event, just some kind of strange coincidence. I had absolutely no explanation for what had happened! But it made quite an impression on me and the teacher, who had also studied Psychology and suggested I’d read Jung’s work.
Jung was talking about a collective unconscious. To me it sounded like a weird theory, but it seemed to be the only logical explanation for what had happened.
Years later I had a discussion with a colleague at work about this. On the radio news it was announced that funding was given to ESP research. And she replied:”What a waste of money! There is no such thing!” I carefully replied:”Yes, there is! And it is important that they look into this.” She laughed and said:” You don’t believe in this Hocus-Pocus do you?” Then I confessed that I have actually experienced it firsthand!
She challenged me and I accepted, although I had no idea whether I could do this ‘on command’ or not. I focused on her for the first couple of days of the week and then I actually forgot about it. Yet that Friday evening, I got this vision in my head. She was screaming and yelling at a lady sitting on a sofa. I could not hear what it was about because there was no sound. I could see the entire room! My colleague, left the room and slammed the door behind her, went through a hall way and turned right to go up stairs. There she went into a room with a white door on the right. There I lost the image.
That Monday I told her what had happened that Friday night and I described her mother, the living room in her house, the interior design and the location of her room upstairs. Unfortunately my colleague freaked out! She tried to avoid me and I felt she suddenly feared me. She asked:”What else do you know?” I said:”Nothing! I only know you have had an argument with your mother Friday night! That’s it! I do not even know what it was about and I don’t want to.” “You asked me if I could use ESP and to prove it is real!” “YOU wanted THIS!” I replied. “Now that I gave you your proof, you think I’m a spy or a freak!” We never discussed the subject again. But I learned my lesson.
It occurred to me that some factors are important to trigger this ‘Bi-location’ (for me personally). Although it doesn’t feel like telepathy (I am not perceiving anything through their eyes) it seems I have to establish some kind of link or relationship with the person (who functions as a beacon). The ‘signal or signature’ of this particular person only stands out when there is a true and serious emotional peak, like anger, frustration, fear or panic. And at the time the emotional peak takes place I have to be doing something that does not require a lot of my attention, like driving on a long road, doing the dishes, cleaning or other repetitive simple work. These are activities that, I now know take you more easily into the meditative Alpha State. It also seems important to think about that person for a while and then let it go... (Meaning: Not thinking about the person at all and just doing other things.)
One day my ex-husband was not home from work at the time he should be. He did not call and I could not reach him on his mobile. After an hour or so I got worried and I decided if all technology failed, I might try a different type of contact.
I pictured him in my mind and asked the questions:”Where are you? What are you doing?” Then I went to do the dishes, because I already had dinner by myself. Shortly after that I got a picture of him walking on the side of the road with something in his hand and I saw a bright lit Shell logo that he was walking towards in the dark.
An hour later he arrived home. And before he could apologize, I told him what I had perceived. He was indeed without fuel and he did walk along the road to get some fuel at a Shell Station. He was frustrated at the time. Again I perceived everything from a bird’s eye point of view.
Does it always have to be a personal link or contact? Or can it be contact with a person though other forms of communication?
I had a very good internet contact with a person on the other side of the world. We talked about the possibilities of ESP and what we could do. I told him I could see in distant locations at times and pick up on things that are there around the person. He asked me to tell him what I could pick up on his location. I asked him twice that he would not freak out and he assured me he would not.
I described the area where he was, his house and even the medication he was taking at that time and that it was stored in a medicine cabinet. I could even read part of the prescription on the bottle. This got him really enthusiastic, since he could only confirm I was correct. I even described some old medication that he did not use anymore, but was still in the cabinet. I had never met him in person or been to his country before and we had never talked on the phone at that stage. Later we did have some phone conversations and I went to visit him. Again this was a form of Bi-Location, although not as strong as with heavy emotional peak and a more personal connection.
It clearly shows to me that there is some kind of connection on another level. Perhaps it is the quantum level? It is definitely something we cannot perceive with the naked eye or measure proprely yet. (I believe we soon will be able to measure the effects.) There is definitely some kind of signal in the ‘air’ that I am able to pick up on that activates some kind of chemicals in my brain or body that allow me to perceive things beyond the normal five senses that are at a distant location and on verification turn out to be perceived correct.
Perhaps the ‘carrier wave of Psi’ scientists are looking for is the supposed Quantum wave-particle duality.
This would suggest that any kind of Remote Viewing IS a form of Remote Influencing...Since a Remote Viewer is observing in two places at the same time. If you are able to divide your attention in two places at the same time and observe (Bi-location) you are making the wave function collapse in two different places simultaneously through a form of entanglement on a different level.
On several occasion the indications of something actually happening at the Remote Viewed location has been registered. Ingo Swan perturbed the highly sensitive Magnetometer in a vault under the floor, simply by Remote Viewing it. The Chinese have reported that photon particles instantly appear near the object that is Remote Viewed and random event generators seem to be influenced when someone is Remote Viewing and on target.
Literally meaning: making Psi contact can be measured.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Psi Practice
In order to test and practice my Psi abilities I use the website Tenthousandroads.com where after registering you can log-in to the Dojo. This amazing piece of programming work (by PJ)allows Remote Viewers and Psychics to 'play' with their skills.
The software appoints a code to a picture target. All the Remote Viewer gets to see is the alpha numeric code. The viewer is totally blind to the target. It could be a picture of anything!
After finishing the session, you can view the feedback. There is no way you can add anything after viewing the feedback! You can decide to make your sessions public or keep them private.
Here is an example of the feedback on a recent session.
This is just a quick 5 minute Psi impression. A Remote Viewing session will take longer and involves sketching and the full descriptions of colors, textures, tastes, smells, temperatures, dimensions, aestethic impact, emotional impact and at times even the phonetics of names of places and people present in the picture.
If you are on signal line and you can achieve this result in five minutes...what would a person be able to reach in 45 minutes to an hour?
The software appoints a code to a picture target. All the Remote Viewer gets to see is the alpha numeric code. The viewer is totally blind to the target. It could be a picture of anything!
After finishing the session, you can view the feedback. There is no way you can add anything after viewing the feedback! You can decide to make your sessions public or keep them private.
Here is an example of the feedback on a recent session.
This is just a quick 5 minute Psi impression. A Remote Viewing session will take longer and involves sketching and the full descriptions of colors, textures, tastes, smells, temperatures, dimensions, aestethic impact, emotional impact and at times even the phonetics of names of places and people present in the picture.
If you are on signal line and you can achieve this result in five minutes...what would a person be able to reach in 45 minutes to an hour?
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Research and Intuition
Ever since I can remember I have always been torn between actual proof and intuition.
Simply stated ‘You know it is true, but you do not have the means to prove it!’
The logical ‘down to earth’ person in me says intuition is fine...but where are the facts? If something happens to me several times in a row, I can see that as a pattern. Yet others may dismiss it as pure coincidence. Still, I can’t dismiss the pattern, simply because I observed it!
I had discovered such a pattern in Remote Viewing. At times I was able to tell whether I was ‘on’ or ‘off’ target. According to a well respected Remote Viewing Trainer, that was impossible! Remote Viewing holds a strict protocol, and you are not allowed to ‘think’ about the target.
He said:”If you say you know you are on or off target, you are thinking!”
I disputed that I was thinking. In my case I feel the signal line! I recognize the feeling of what it is like to be on target. If that particular feeling is not there...I just know my session will be a waste of paper! There is no reason to continue.
I agree you have to be careful not to misinterpret your own possible insecurity, especially when you just start to use your Psi-talents. Yet, I have over 20 years of experience with natural Psi, I know by now the difference between fantasy, memory and Psi-events.
Knowing or feeling when you are ‘on’ or ‘off’ target is a very, very valuable tool! Since you can actually separate the junk from the real thing it improves the accuracy dramatically!
It doesn’t mean that the session is always helpful in a practical sense, but it does mean you can exclude most of the misses.
I believe it will not take long before researchers come up with evidence for my theory that experienced people can actually feel the signal line! And that the signal line is more than a theoretical name for something intangible, it is very real!
I know my intuition is right...all I have to do now it wait for the evidence to present itself.
Simply stated ‘You know it is true, but you do not have the means to prove it!’
The logical ‘down to earth’ person in me says intuition is fine...but where are the facts? If something happens to me several times in a row, I can see that as a pattern. Yet others may dismiss it as pure coincidence. Still, I can’t dismiss the pattern, simply because I observed it!
I had discovered such a pattern in Remote Viewing. At times I was able to tell whether I was ‘on’ or ‘off’ target. According to a well respected Remote Viewing Trainer, that was impossible! Remote Viewing holds a strict protocol, and you are not allowed to ‘think’ about the target.
He said:”If you say you know you are on or off target, you are thinking!”
I disputed that I was thinking. In my case I feel the signal line! I recognize the feeling of what it is like to be on target. If that particular feeling is not there...I just know my session will be a waste of paper! There is no reason to continue.
I agree you have to be careful not to misinterpret your own possible insecurity, especially when you just start to use your Psi-talents. Yet, I have over 20 years of experience with natural Psi, I know by now the difference between fantasy, memory and Psi-events.
Knowing or feeling when you are ‘on’ or ‘off’ target is a very, very valuable tool! Since you can actually separate the junk from the real thing it improves the accuracy dramatically!
It doesn’t mean that the session is always helpful in a practical sense, but it does mean you can exclude most of the misses.
I believe it will not take long before researchers come up with evidence for my theory that experienced people can actually feel the signal line! And that the signal line is more than a theoretical name for something intangible, it is very real!
I know my intuition is right...all I have to do now it wait for the evidence to present itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
